![]() ![]() There is an overwhelming opinion out there that if you have the. Our company specializes in selling high performance custom computers, and that naturally brings up the question of RAID often. Plus render speedĪs president of Puget Custom Computers, I get a unique perspective on computer products and technology. That would be the only way I could afford a Quadro RTX 5000 but then whilst gaining some single core speed would loose it with the render times and lack of lands and connect and upgradabilty. The ASUS board was the top option on the Scan uk configurator and PC Specialist More likely the former due to the wireless and lan and m2 add on card. If I was going to go down this route I think the two board I may look at would be the It could help towards getting items like a Greenscreen & photo studio set up, podcast kit and or DSLR cameras Not sure, as one reason for the thread ripper system was the number of lanes and thus space to upgrade that comes with them not just the power. ![]() which would probably be more beneficial for your career perspective than buying a top of the line system with too little money left to quickly improve your skills with training/courses. Given your situation you might want to save some substantial money that you could use to pay for training etc. Yes, programs like V-Ray can max out a Threadripper and RAM and GPU and yes it does make a lot of difference if you are doing tons of renders on a daily basis but it is overkill if you are not at that point yet. Even on an i5 CPU laptop I could get sufficiently fast renders with Renderworks. The point of this is that even with relatively modest hardware (compared to a full blown Threadripper, RAM and Quadro setup) you may still get very good performance if the software is well written. on the same machine it took VW+Renderworks 5 minutes per render with a much better quality, this on a "measly" 2nd gen i7 with 8GB of RAM. I loaded the DWG model in VW to see how well it would do. Things are a bit different with recent VW version but at one point I had a 3D model that took AutoCAD an hour to render and I had to do 10 different renders (It was a very large model and needed close up renders of various sections). When push comes to shove later you could still get a Threadripper mobo and CPU and then use the existing RAM, Quadro card and drives etc. ^^This is probably the best route to take at the moment after reading your explanation of where you are and where you want to go, especially if you are not doing high end CPU rendering at the moment. Wasn't just thinking GPus but other add on cards like a 2-4 way additional m.2 ssd drive card, more ssd drives, maybe a future audio card ertc This means that two graphics cards supporting PCIe 4.0 on 8 PCIe 4.0 lanes each would be practically as fast as two graphics cards on 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes each (as for example it's the case in the MacPro which promotes its many pcie 3.0 lanes). ![]() (That's why I explicitly recommended an X570 board, these are the only ones that support it at the moment) Since PCIe 4.0 is about twice as fast as the currently common PCIe 3.0, this will also be enough for several graphics cards, even if they are therefore only connected on the 8 instead of 16 lanes. Also you could then connect two PCIe 4.0 capable graphics cards. If you later realize that you want to have multiple GPU's, you won't have much of a performance penalty, because they are only connected with x8 instead of x16. If you're doing a single- GPU setup, you've had enough of them anyway. I wouldn't worry too much about the Lanes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |